
ITS Monday: Edition 8, 2026

ITS Monday is a small, weekly collection of curated content from the worlds of intelligent transport systems, smart mobility, and associated areas. This is the 265th edition to date, and the first for 2026.
Included this week, private vehicle use, smart research and city wellbeing, AI-defined cars, and digital kerb management..
The article headlines below are:
- Crowdshipping participation among private vehicle users
- Could smart research ensure healthy people in disrupted cities?
- From software defined to AI defined, the next vehicular evolution
- Digital curb management may be more a vision than a reality
This week’s articles
Now, scroll down, and see what’s in this week’s edition. Oh, and before you do, be sure check out the quickest way to receive our new content via the subscription box just below …


Crowdshipping participation among private vehicle users
First up, this from David Levinson‘s Transportist blog, “This study investigates the determinants of willingness to participate in crowd shipping (WTP-CS) for the working population within the Mumbai Metropolitan Region. It explores socioeconomic factors, personality traits, and travel correlates to WTP-CS by testing an integrated choice and latent variable (ICLV) modeling framework. Four conclusions are drawn.”
READ THE ARTICLE
Could smart research ensure healthy people in disrupted cities?
A new academic paper, co-authored by Billie Giles-Corti, Belen Zapata-Diomedi, Afshin Jafari, Alan Both, and Lucy Gunn. The abstract:
Since the late 19th century, city planners have struggled to cope with new types of urban transport and mobility that threatened the existing system, or even rendered it obsolete.
As city planners confront the range of disruptive urban mobilities currently on the horizon, this paper explores how we can draw on a vast body of evidence to anticipate and avoid unintended consequences to people’s health and wellbeing. This commentary involved a rapid review of the literature on transport disruption.
We found that to avoid the unintended consequences of disruption, research, policy and practice must think beyond single issues (such as the risk of chronic disease, injury, or traffic management) and consider the broader consequences of interventions. For example, although autonomous vehicles will probably reduce road trauma, what will be the negative consequences for physical inactivity, sedentary behavior, chronic disease, land use, traffic congestion and commuting patterns? Research is needed that considers and informs how to mitigate the range of potential harms caused by disruptive mobilities.
READ THE ARTICLE
From software defined to AI defined, the next vehicular evolution
This is from Tom Tom’s blog. “The automotive world doesn’t slow down. The technology shaping and driving the industry is ushering evolution after evolution. Vehicle software is levelling up, bringing us cars with machine learning, end-to-end perception models and more intelligent in-cabin technology. This is the dawn of the AI-defined vehicle.”
READ THE ARTICLE

Digital curb management may be more a vision than a reality
“Streets’ many users, their large amount of potential data and the complexity of standing up digital curb systems can pose challenges. A digital map or street inventory can be a first step for local government.”
READ THE ARTICLEDiscover more from iMOVE Australia Cooperative Research Centre | Transport R&D
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

